Australia: The Future Fund goes Ballistic

mischaOpinion polls show that Australians overwhelmingly oppose nuclear weapons. So when we learned in 2011 that our major federal government investment fund – the so-called Future Fund – has substantial investments in nuclear weapons companies, there was widespread public uproar.

Melbourne’s leading daily newspaper, The Age, ran a front-page story with the headline: “Australia investing in nuclear arms.” The following day, readers reacted angrily on the letters pages, and a cartoon depicted businessmen being hurled through the air by an exploding nuclear bomb. “The Future Fund goes ballistic,” read the caption.

We uncovered this controversial information using freedom-of-information laws, which allow any member of the public to gain access to documents held by Australian government agencies. There was no charge for this service.

When the news broke, the Future Fund stated that it had no plans to divest from companies involved in nuclear weapons production, even though it had earlier divested from cluster munitions and landmines. It claimed that countries such as the United States, Britain and France possess nuclear weapons legitimately.

Not satisfied with this response, we encouraged friendly senators to quiz the Future Fund leadership about their position in the parliament. This helped keep the issue on the political agenda. The minister overseeing the fund, Senator Penny Wong, was forced to defend the position.

We then commissioned legal advice from a team of top barristers, who found that the Future Fund had failed to comply with its own stated investment policies. They noted that, under Australian law, it is an offence to assist the “manufacture, production, acquisition or testing” of nuclear explosive devices both inside and outside Australia.

More recently, we submitted 14,000 petition signatures to the chair of the Future Fund demanding that he back efforts to achieve a nuclear-weapon-free world. We also protested outside the Future Fund’s headquarters. We believe that it should set a positive example for other financial institutions in Australia.

We have learned that it’s best to focus on a small number of financial institutions, or just one, rather than every financial institution with a possible link to the nuclear arms industry. Ideally, the targeted institutions should be those that are most susceptible to public pressure and most likely to lead the way for other institutions to divest.

The Don’t Bank on the Bomb report in 2012 revealed that most Australian banks have provided loans to nuclear weapons companies at some stage since 2008. Disappointingly, none have shown a willingness to divest, but they draw the line at financing projects specifically for nuclear weapons work.

As part of our divestment campaigning, we have also approached all major Australian superannuation funds. Some of the more progressive funds agreed to conduct a review of their investments to ensure that no nuclear weapons companies had slipped through the gaps. Others noted that their “ethical” options (but not their general funds) already exclude the arms industry.

In 2013 we launched a report on university investments in nuclear weapons companies, titled Disarm Your Degree. Although the universities we targeted were all public institutions, it was often difficult to find detailed information on their investments. Where we could confirm they invested in nuclear weapons companies, we have worked with students and academics to build pressure for divestment.

While tangible successes to date have been limited, our work has at least helped raise public awareness about the ongoing threat of nuclear weapons. It has shown how this global problem can be dealt with at a local level, even in countries without nuclear weapons. And it has reinforced the need for a total ban on nuclear weapons – so no financial institution can ever claim these weapons are “legitimate”.

Tim Wright is Australian director of ICAN.

This report provides the basis for coordinated campaigning to discourage financial institutions from investing in nuclear weapons companies. Taking action can involve meeting with bank representatives, organizing protests outside their headquarters or branches, raising public awareness, finding allies and promoting legislation prohibiting investment. You can also use social media, like twitter.

Download the Campaigner Guide.

Send a message to financial institutions!

I’ve decided to divest, what now? 

Why Campaign on Divestment?

Open the debate! Disinvestment campaigns attract media attention and re-open discussions as to what is acceptable and what is not. Showing that there is less interest in financing the bomb shows that nuclear weapons are less legitimate. This can help to sway politicians and civil servants and reactivate the debate about nuclear weapons in a different way.

Build new norms! Once financial institutions change their policies to ban investment in nuclear weapons, they start developing new investment standards and norms. Financial institutions represent a huge influence on producers of nuclear weapons, and have the power to directly influence and engage with producers of nuclear weapons. Working with financial institutions is a powerful way to directly influence companies practices and demonstrate that nuclear weapons are not a feasible long term business interest.

Reach the whole of society! This activity lets you reach out to financial institutions, ministries of finance, companies, ethical advisor firms- a whole new range of actors to generate and demonstrate whole of society support for a ban!

Everyone can act! Often, nuclear weapons are a vague and distant idea- they are not real or connected to day to day life, and acting for abolition feels like something for policy experts only. But almost everybody has a bank account. By building a “not with my money!” feeling, we can encourage people to contact their banks or pension funds and take useful action to ban (investments) in the bomb. It brings the issue closer to people’s day to day life, with an opportunity to act.

Get creative! This type of campaigning is focused, targeted, empowering and effective. Divestment efforts also give you a chance to get creative and use an all inclusive approach to reach out and speak out against nuclear weapons.

No party excuses! Divestment efforts are not tied to one political party or political side of the spectrum. Divestment is a way to reach across party divides and build broad inclusive relationships in the campaign to outlaw and eliminate nuclear weapons.

It Works! In recent years the financial industry has become increasingly aware of the importance of Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) practices. Since these SRI go beyond legal obligations, campaigners can demonstrate success for the cause before any legal international framework compels financial institutions to act.

Engage the Public

Engage the Media

Engage the Government

Engage Financial Institutions

Take Action for Divestment

his report provides the basis for coordinated campaigning to discourage financial institutions from investing in nuclear weapons companies. Taking action…

Read more