Aerojet Rocketdyne

Aerojet Rocketdyne (United States), formerly known as GenCorp is involved in the design, development and production of land- and sea-based nuclear ballistic missile systems for the United States. It is currently producing propulsion systems for Minuteman III and D5 Trident nuclear missiles. 

Company profile

Company profile

Aerojet Rocketdyne, formerly GenCorp, based in the US, is engaged in aerospace and military (through subsidiary Aerojet) (more than 99%) and real estate (Easton).[i]

In the financial year ending 31 December 2016, Aerojet Rocketdyne generated revenues of US$ 1.8 billion (€ 1.7 billion), resulting in an operating income of US$ 61.2 million (€ 58.1 million) and a net loss of US$ 18.0 million (€ 17.0 million).[ii]

Contact information

Website: Twitter: Facebook:
www.aerojetrocketdyne.com/ @AerojetRdyne www.facebook.com/AerojetRdyne

Aerojet Rocketdyne Corporate Headquarters
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc.
222 N. Sepulveda Blvd, Suite 500,El Segundo, CA 90245 USA
1-310-252-8100

Nuclear weapons

Aerojet Rocketdyne’s aerospace and military segment is involved in design, development and production of land-based and sea-based nuclear ballistic missile systems.[iii] It currently produces solid and liquid propulsion systems for the Minuteman III and Trident II (D5) nuclear missile systems.[iv] There are 400 Minuteman III currently deployed and they are expected to stay active until at least 2030.[v] The Air Force “plans to replace the missiles with a new Ground-based Strategic Deterrent around 2030”.[vi] The submarine-launched Trident II (D5) missile is currently aboard US Ohio-class and British Vanguard-class submarines.[vii] The US is planning to keep the Trident II missiles deployed until 2042.[viii]

In October 2013, Aerojet Rocketdyne was awarded a US$ 28.9 million (€ 21.2 million) contract under the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center Propulsion Applications Program (PAP) to develop a Medium Class Stage III motor with propulsion technologies applicable to multiple future common strategic propulsion systems. The programme aims to provide a direct replacement solution option for the Minuteman III stage III motors. Besides modernising and replacing Minuteman III, the motors are also meant to support a wide range of potential strategic propulsion systems. Work was meant to be completed by October 2016, however, it is unclear as of August 2017 whether the contract is complete.[ix]

In February 2016, Aerojet Rocketdyne was awarded a US$ 3 million (€ 2.7 million) contract for trade studies and hardware demonstrations for the ICBM Demonstration and Validation Post Boost Program over a period of two years. The aim of the programme is to develop and evaluate technologies for the future replacement of the current Minuteman III Propulsion System Rocket Engine (PSRE).[x]

Notes


Notes

[i]            Aerojet Rocketdyne, “About us”, Website Aerojet Rocketdyne (www.aerojetrocketdyne.com/about-us), viewed
July 2017;
Aerojet Rocketdyne, “Annual Report 2016”, Aerojet Rocketdyne, February 2017, p. 138.

[ii]           Aerojet Rocketdyne, “Annual Report 2016”, Aerojet Rocketdyne, February 2017.

[iii]           Aerojet Rocketdyne, “About”, Website Aerojet Rocketdyne (www.rocket.com/about), viewed July 2017.

[iv]          Aerojet Rocketdyne, “Trident II D-5 PBCS”, Website Aeroject Rocketdyne (www.rocket.com/trident-d-5-pbcs), viewed July 2017;
Aerojet Rocketdyne, “Minuteman III PSRE”, Website Aerojet Rocketdyne (www.rocket.com/minuteman-iii-psre), viewed July 2017.

[v]           Woolf, A.E., “US Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments and Issues”, Congressional Research Service, 10 February 2017 (www.fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RL33640.pdf).

[vi]          Woolf, A.E., “US Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments and Issues”, Congressional Research Service, 10 February 2017 (www.fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RL33640.pdf).

[vii]          Lockheed Martin, “Trident II D5 Fleet Balistic Missile (FBM)”, Website Lockheed Martin (www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/trident-ii-d5-fleet-ballistic-missile–fbm-.html), viewed July 2017.

[viii]         Strategic Systems Programs Public Affairs, “Back to the Future with Trident Life Extension”, Undersea Warfare, Spring 2012 (www.ssp.navy.mil/documents/trident_life_extension.pdf).

[ix]          U.S. Department of Defense, “Daily contract list – Contract FA8219-14-C-0002”, Website U.S. Department of Defense, 18 October 2013 (archive.defense.gov/Contracts/Contract.aspx?ContractID=5146);
GenCorp, “USAF Awards Aerojet Rocketdyne a Medium Class Stage III Demonstration Contract”, News Release GenCorp, 2 December 2013 (ir.aerojetrocketdyne.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=810847).

[x]           Aerojet Rocketdyne, “Aerojet Rocketdyne Awarded ICBM Demonstration and Validation Post Boost Contract”, News release Aerojet Rocketdyne, 19 February 2016 (ir.aerojetrocketdyne.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=955842).

Investors

 

 

Investors

The following financial institutions have made approximately US$ 2,685 million available to this producer since January 2014.

  • Ameriprise Financial (United States)
  • Bank of America (United States)
  • Bank of New York Mellon (United States)
  • BlackRock (United States)
  • BPCE Group (France)
  • Charles Schwab (United States)
  • Citigroup (United States)
  • Citizens Financial Group (United States)
  • Deutsche Bank (Germany)
  • Dimensional Fund Advisors (United States)
  • Fidelity Investments (United States)
  • Fifth Third Bancorp (United States)
  • Geode Capital Management (United States)
  • GGCP (United States)
  • Hartford Financial Services (United States)
  • Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management (United States)
  • JPMorgan Chase (United States)
  • Keycorp (United States)
  • Kingstown Capital Management (United States)
  • Legg Mason (United States)
  • Leucadia National Corporation (United States)
  • M&T Bank (United States)
  • Millennium Management (United States)
  • Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (Japan)
  • Morgan Stanley (United States)
  • New York Life Insurance (United States)
  • NewSouth Capital Management (United States)
  • Nomura (Japan)
  • Northern Trust (United States)
  • Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (United States)
  • Paloma Partners (United States)
  • Principal Financial Group (United States)
  • Prudential (UK) (United Kingdom)
  • Regions Financial (United States)
  • Rothschild Group (France)
  • Royal Bank of Canada (Canada)
  • State Street (United States)
  • Steel Partners Holdings (United States)
  • Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (Japan)
  • SunTrust (United States)
  • T. Rowe Price (United States)
  • TIAA (United States)
  • Ullink  (France)
  • US Bancorp (United States)
  • Vanguard (United States)
  • Victory Capital (United States)
  • Wells Fargo (United States)
  • Winslow Asset Management (United States)

 

Last updated 18 January 2018

 

Producers

In some nuclear-armed states – in particular the United States, the United Kingdom and France – private companies are hired by governments to carry out work on maintaining and modernising nuclear arsenals. This report looks at companies that are providing the necessary components to develop, test, maintain and modernise nuclear weapons.The contracts these companies have with nuclear armed countries are for materials and services to keep nuclear weapons in their arsenals. The companies described are substantially involved in the nuclear weapons programmes of the United States, the United Kingdom, France, or India and are themselves based in France, India, Italy, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States.

In other nuclear-armed countries –Russia, China, Pakistan and North Korea – the maintenance and modernization of nuclear forces is carried out primarily or exclusively by government agencies.

Methodology

The nuclear weapon producers identified were selected on the basis of a predetermined set of criteria.
– Information on investments is publicly available.
– The company is directly involved in the development, testing, production, maintenance or trade of nuclear weapons related technology, parts, products or services.
– The company’s involvement is related to warheads, or to delivery systems such as missiles, that are specifically developed for nuclear tasks. This includes technology that is designed for ‘dual use’ (military and civilian) but excludes technology that is not designed for, but can be used in nuclear warfare. It does not include delivery platforms such as bombers and submarines.

State owned or controlled nuclear industries are outside the scope of this research, as are companies not publicly listed. Our research uncovered a number of Universities involved in nuclear weapons programmes, but these are also outside the scope of the report.

The list of nuclear weapon producers investigated was compiled through a wide variety of sources, including financial institution exclusion lists, civil society reports, media reports, etc. Additional details on the contracts and components can be found in the Annex. We welcome information at any time about possible nuclear weapons producing companies to investigate.